Diversity in the construction sector

Construction picture.jpg

Diversity in the construction sector; It’s been a steady discussion that has spanned the last ten years. We’ve heard of incremental movements happening worldwide to create gender equality and break barriers, but how far has the progression benefitted women in the workplace?

The UK still maintains the lowest percentage of female engineers in Europe, with just 11% of the engineering workforce being women. Studies suggests that women fear a lack of career progression by entering the trade, which may be a result of the industry’s leading authoritative figures being men. This may explain why less women apply to the industry or companies struggle to maintain female employees’ long term. This is reportedly a big problem for companies who are trying to resolve the issue. 

The introduction of gender pay-gap reports has created a pressure for companies to address equality within their organisations. This has helped fuel the discussion of women in the workplace and places a spotlight on male-dominated industries such as the construction sector.

Balfour Beatty has taken a leadership approach to the issue in the aim to inspire and recruit like-minded behaviour by others in the industry. In a recent statement, the company exclaimed “the (gender equality) issues also go far wider than the industry itself. Tackling them will require a joined-up approach from the industry, Government and commissioning authorities, beginning with children at primary school and continuing throughout education and training and in the workplace”. The company continued to put their thoughts into action by creating several initiatives to tackle the issue, such as unconscious bias training, encouraging women to sign up to the Young Women’s trust to gain access to construction apprenticeships, and also created an industry campaign to improve women’s retention and progression.

Other improvements across the industry are coming to light. In 2015, the construction industry witnessed a 20 year high of females being employed, since then its being growing 6.6% each year. The benefits of equality in the workforce are being seen across the construction industry. The 2015 Mckinsey report showed that companies with gender-diversity were performing 14% better than non-diverse companies. Furthermore, it was proven that with a more diverse workforce this resulted in a larger pool of talent with different employee’s bringing different qualities, mindsets and skills. It unlocked an abundance of potential for innovation as embracing diversity and working in unison with different mindsets accumulates a powerful tool that companies should embrace.

The recent pay gap report issued by Cala Homes shows a remarkable effort from the housing industry to address and resolve the issues. Last year, 84.6% of female employees received a bonus, whilst 70.6% of male employees received one. Not only does this show Cala’s dedication to recognising and appraising the success of women in the workforce, but also takes steps to tackle the previously mentioned issue of retainment through fears of lack of career progression. With figures such as these, the construction industry is a much more desirable option for females to enter.

Construction giant Mclaughlin and Harvey stated that women are under-represented in the industry is due to the lack of interest in STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and mathematics). In their 2017 corporate annual report, the firm stated “We actively work with secondary schools before the students choose their subjects, making them aware of the exciting opportunities and wide variety of job roles within the construction industry… Our focus is on encouraging more females into careers in STEM disciplines through our educational partnerships using females already employed in the business as STEM Ambassadors in our local schools.” This is a pivotal step in the reconfiguration of mindset in the industry.  To conclude their efforts, they rounded the discussion with a commitment to building a more diverse workforce and develop new initiatives to improve how they attract, engage and develop women, and other under-represented groups.

By combining Mclaughlin and Harvey’s approach to encouraging STEM subjects to equal genders, and Cala’s approach to employee retention, the future of females in the construction industry looks bright.

Looking ahead to the future, the main factor that requires attention from the construction sector and public alike, is the mindset and attitude towards women in the workplace. There needs to be a shift in discussion where women can play the same roles as men, and the noun of certain roles (engineer, mechanic, builder) is not associated with one gender or another. World globalisation has increased competition and pressure for companies to innovate rapidly. Gender equality produces a wider talent pool and provokes a different thought process when making decisions, ultimately shaping companies to perform better when it comes to the future of their business.

 

 

The changing narrative of the Labour Party

Labour Brexit.jpg

Constitutional matters have always been an issue for the Labour Party. During the Scottish independence referendum in 2014, the Scottish Labour Party’s self-endorsed tagline of “we are neither unionist nor nationalist” summed up the dilemma the party was facing.

Move forward four years to 2018 and the UK Labour Party find’s its self in the same position. At this year’s Labour Party conference in Liverpool, delegates submitted a motion to debate the party’s position on Brexit, which resulted in delegates overwhelmingly voting to keep the option of a peoples vote on the table should there not be a general election.  

The prospect of a general election taking place in 2019 seems unlikely with most Conservative MP’s including the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) likely to support Theresa May in the event of a motion of no confidence, and this is something that Jeremy Corbyn is aware of.

The European Union has said that there will be no further concessions or renegotiation of the withdrawal agreement, which presents another obstacle for Theresa May in her quest to get the withdrawal agreement passed through parliament, with sources suggesting that Ms May could reach out to pro leave opposition members in order to get her deal passed.

The Labour party’s message around Brexit is at best confusing and incoherent. John McDonnell MP, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer said, “a peoples vote is inevitable” and last Thursday Angela Rayner MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Education said, “a second vote would undermine democracy”.

Andrew Gwynne MP, National campaign Coordinator for the Labour Party has suggested that the Labour Party will put it to members at a special party conference on the party’s next steps on Brexit. What will be on the ballot paper is another question, but the prospect of a special party conference further illustrates the dilemma that constitutional matters present to the Labour Party, and the lack of direction from the front bench, which is understandable given that there is a split between Labour MP’s who represent both leave and remain constituencies.

Whilst the referendum in 2016 was democratic, sometimes even democracy can get it wrong, and what people know about Brexit now is that it will have severe implications for the country.

This debate can not be viewed in the context of a left v right struggle, but rather what is in the best interests of the country, and what is needed is politicians to have the conviction and the courage to do the right thing for the country and push for a second referendum, otherwise if Labour is perceived to be the facilitators of Brexit, it could have far reaching consequences for the future of the Labour Party.

 

 

The Future of the UK hangs in the balance over the next five days

Brexit.jpg

They say a week is a long time in politics, but the next five days will prove crucial for Theresa May as she aims to persuade parliament that her Brexit deal is the best deal for the country. So, what will the next five days entail and what could potentially happen?

Contempt of parliament

In response to calls from the Labour Party, Liberal Democrats, Scottish National Party (SNP), Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), Plaid Cymru and the Green Party that the government is in contempt of parliament, John Bercow, speaker of the House of commons has said there was “an arguable case that a contempt of parliament has been committed.”  

Today, the first order of business will be for the House of Commons to vote on the allegation that the government was in contempt of parliament as a result of the Attorney general not disclosing the full legal advice given to the cabinet on the EU withdrawal agreement.  

Advocates of the withdrawal agreement will say that this is a delay tactic by opposition parties, and those opposed to Theresa May’s plan would argue that given what’s at stake parliament needs to know what advice was given to the cabinet in order to make an informed decision when it comes to the meaningful vote which takes place on the 11 December.

If the House of Commons vote that the government was in contempt of parliament, then the matter could, potentially be referred to the House of Commons Privileges Committee, who will investigate the complaint, whether that would delay the Brexit debate is largely unknown, but it is widely speculated that the government will table an amendment which could result in the government publishing the Attorney General’s advice to the government on the EU withdrawal agreement.

Over the course of the next five days all eyes will be on the House of Commons as the UK debates the EU withdrawal agreement, with the meaningful vote taking place on the 11 December. There are only two outcomes of the meaningful vote:

Government wins

The government gets the proposed withdrawal agreement passed through parliament, as protocol, it would go to the House of Lords to be debated, which could see further amendments being included and sent back to the House of Commons for a further debate before royal assent is given.

EU Withdrawal bill is voted down

The withdrawal agreement is voted down by parliament. This would be a devastating blow not only to the government, but to Theresa May’s credibility and the potential consequences of the government losing the vote on the EU withdrawal bill could be far reaching which could result in:

A vote of no confidence

The Labour Party has already indicated that it will table a motion of no confidence in the current government. For a vote of no confidence to be passed “a number equal to or greater than two thirds of the number of seats in the House” must vote for it. This is a real possibility given the numbers against the proposed withdrawal bill.

General election

The vote of no confidence would most likely result in a General Election, with parties likely to pledge a second Brexit referendum as part of their election manifesto commitment, but the question is, will remain be an option on the ballot.

 

 

 

Living wage accredited

We believe that everyone who has a vested interest in our business should be paid a decent wage, and as of today we are an accredited living wage employer. It sounds like a cliché, but people make Pentland and we value everyone who has helped shape our business so far.

We believe businesses have more than a statutory responsibility to its people, and we want to do everything we can to ensure that people share in our success.

Living wage employer.jpg


Chancellor of the Exchequer's budget statement

Chancellor pic.jpg

Tomorrow, all eyes will be on Philip Hammond, Chancellor of the Exchequer, as he delivers his third budget statement to the House of Commons, but this won’t be any ordinary budget announcement, it will be the last one the chancellor makes to parliament, before the United Kingdom leaves the European Union next year. Pentland looks at what we can expect from the forthcoming budget.

Is austerity over?

Following on from Theresa May’s claim that “austerity is over” the pressure will be on Mr Hammond to come up with the necessary public spending to match that bold claim, with the Resolution Foundation suggesting that it will take an extra £30bn of public spending by the end of this parliament to end austerity.

The dilemma for Mr Hammond is, does he choose to stick to the Conservative manifesto pledge to get rid of the deficit by 2025 or embark on increased public spending ?

Brexit

As a committed remainer, Mr Hammond has repeatedly warned of the serious implications for the UK’s economy in the event of there being a no deal Brexit. In August, Mr Hammond said “leaving the European Union without a deal could have large fiscal consequences” whilst the Institute of Economic Research suggests that the difference between a deal and no deal Brexit could be in the region of £30 billion.

The High Street

With the decline of Britain’s High street, there will be pressure on Mr Hammond to propose measures to reverse what many people believe to be the death of the High Street. It is widely speculated that Mr Hammond will announce a boost worth £1.5bn for the UK’s High Street, which will include plans to cut business rates for small retailers and relax town planning laws.

It is also expected that Mr Hammond will announce plans to tax internet retail giants such as Amazon, amid speculation that internet retail companies don’t pay tax due to international tax loopholes.

Whilst, this will be welcomed by high street retailers, Mr Hammond also stressed that the changing face of the UK high street as a shopping destination means that the high street must evolve with the possibility of empty retail premises being used for housing.

Small businesses

It is rumoured that Mr Hammond could reduce the threshold for VAT payments by small businesses, from £85,000 to £43,000, which could potentially generate £1.5 billion in revenue for the government but won’t be a popular move with the 5.7 million small businesses in the UK.

Housing

During the Conservative Party conference, Theresa May announced the end of the borrowing cap, which was welcomed by local authorities up and down the country. It is suggested that the amount of investment needed could total £1 billion per year, with borrowing likely to be under tight fiscal rules.

NHS

Mr Hammond has suggested that he will offer a £20 billion spending boost for the NHS with any increases in tax being an “absolute minimum.”

 

=U�